Biden’s DOJ withdrew subpoena for Twitter account parodying Nunes

The Hill

The filing was revealed a day after a federal court in Washington, D.C., unsealed a motion showing the Trump administration’s DOJ had issued a grand jury subpoena to Twitter demanding that it turn over the identifying information regarding the user @NunesAlt.

The latest document unsealed Tuesday shows that the U.S. Attorney’s office in D.C. withdrew the subpoena in March, two months after President Biden took office.

In the filing, the DOJ asked a federal judge in March to deny Twitter’s motion to quash the subpoena, saying the case was moot since the demand had been withdrawn March 17.

On Monday it was revealed that Twitter had asked a federal judge to throw out the subpoena, arguing that it raised First Amendment concerns.

Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/554191-bidens-doj-withdrew-subpoena-for-twitter-account-parodying-nunes

The Trump administration spied on journalists. The Biden administration defended it.

Columbia Journalism Review

Fast forward to Friday, when—to the consternation of many journalists—Biden’s Justice Department defended the Trump-era move against the Post as, in Barrett’s words, “an investigative step of last resort that was not taken lightly.” We do not yet know of any instances of Biden himself going after journalists’ sources. But he hasn’t pledged explicitly that he won’t, either—and, in its first weeks in office, his administration continued the Trump-era push to extradite and prosecute Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, under the Espionage Act, drawing blowback from a coalition of press-freedom groups who say that the charges against Assange threaten to criminalize various routine acts of journalism. As the Freedom of the Press Foundation noted in January, after Biden was inaugurated, he had “already been lauded for striking a new tone” with the press. “But refraining from insulting and delegitimizing reporters on a daily basis is an incredibly low bar. It is by the actions of its Justice Department and intelligence agencies that the Biden administration should ultimately be judged.”

Source: https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/trump_washington_post_surveillance_biden.php

Trump Justice Department secretly obtained Post reporters’ phone records

The Washington Post

In three separate letters dated May 3 and addressed to Post reporters Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller, and former Post reporter Adam Entous, the Justice Department wrote they were “hereby notified that pursuant to legal process the United States Department of Justice received toll records associated with the following telephone numbers for the period from April 15, 2017 to July 31, 2017.” The letters listed work, home or cellphone numbers covering that three-and-a-half-month period.

Cameron Barr, The Post’s acting executive editor, said: “We are deeply troubled by this use of government power to seek access to the communications of journalists. The Department of Justice should immediately make clear its reasons for this intrusion into the activities of reporters doing their jobs, an activity protected under the First Amendment.”

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-justice-dept-seized-post-reporters-phone-records/2021/05/07/933cdfc6-af5b-11eb-b476-c3b287e52a01_story.html

Trump’s string of legal losses includes First Amendment cases

CNN

Brian Stelter highlights three legal defeats for President Trump and his campaign that were victories for editorial independence and press freedom. In one of the cases, a Trump appointee who oversees Voice of America was barred from any actions that would curb VOA’s independence.

Source: https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2020/11/22/trumps-string-of-legal-losses-includes-first-amendment-cases.cnn/video/playlists/business-reliable-sources/

Trump’s attempt to ban TikTok and WeChat could face legal trouble for infringing on free speech, according to a First Amendment expert

Business Insider

Kyle Langvardt, a law professor at the University of Nebraska Lincoln, told Business Insider that Trump’s orders “are likely to have First Amendment problems.”

“The reason is that they discriminate based on the identity of the speaker (Bytedance, Tencent), and also, arguably, based on the ‘content’ of their speech,” Langvardt said.

Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-tiktok-and-wechat-bans-could-violate-first-amendment-expert-2020-8