Biden’s Choice on Julian Assange and the First Amendment

The Intercept

When Joe Biden becomes president of the United States on January 20, a historic opportunity awaits him to demonstrate America’s commitment to the First Amendment. He can, in a stroke, reverse four years of White House persecution of journalism by withdrawing the application to extradite Julian Assange from Britain to the U.S. This would be in line with the departures from Trump policies Biden is proposing on health care, environmental protection, and tax fairness. Assange’s liberty represents the liberty of all journalists and publishers whose job is to expose government and corporate criminality without fear of prosecution. We need and deserve to be protected against government control of the press.

Source: https://theintercept.com/2020/12/01/assange-first-amendment-biden/

How will Biden’s new team treat the press?

Columbia Journalism Review

Biden’s recent record with the press is far from perfect. Last year, after his late-ish entry into the Democratic primary, he largely skirted the national media—an apparent bid to limit his potential to commit “gaffes” (long a staple of Biden coverage) and leave intact voters’ memories of Cool Uncle Joe, Obama’s vice president—though he did give interviews to local news stations. As Biden’s campaign flailed in Iowa and New Hampshire, he opened up more, but once he’d locked up the nomination, the pandemic hit, and he mostly stayed in his basement—a perfectly understandable public-health precaution that nonetheless didn’t come with generous workarounds for press access; at one point, Biden went three months without holding a news conference, virtual or otherwise.

Source: https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/joe_biden_communications_team_press_secretary.php

What’s in store for technology and press rights in 2021?

Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

This is the season for look-aheads: What kind of policy and personnel choices should we expect to see from the executive branch following Joe Biden’s inauguration in January? Here at the Reporters Committee, we’re beginning to take stock of what a new administration might mean for technology, press rights and the First Amendment. What follows is a brief, inexhaustive list of what the Technology and Press Freedom Project will be watching.

Source: https://www.rcfp.org/tech-press-freedom-nov-22-2020/

Trump’s string of legal losses includes First Amendment cases

CNN

Brian Stelter highlights three legal defeats for President Trump and his campaign that were victories for editorial independence and press freedom. In one of the cases, a Trump appointee who oversees Voice of America was barred from any actions that would curb VOA’s independence.

Source: https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2020/11/22/trumps-string-of-legal-losses-includes-first-amendment-cases.cnn/video/playlists/business-reliable-sources/

Lawsuit demands sign language at White House virus briefings

The New York Times

4xp-interpreter-jumbo-v2

The National Association of the Deaf and five deaf Americans have sued the White House, arguing that the lack of a sign language interpreter at President Trump’s coronavirus briefings violates the First Amendment.

The association is seeking to force Mr. Trump and other White House officials to use American Sign Language, or A.S.L., interpreters during “television broadcasts of their coronavirus press conferences and briefings to make them accessible to deaf and hard-of-hearing people.”

The lawsuit contends that the refusal to provide in-frame sign language prevents the plaintiffs from accessing the communications provided by their elected representatives, thus violating their First Amendment rights.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/04/us/politics/asl-interpreter-lawsuit-coronavirus-trump.html